Heckelodes and Coquandon nom. nov., replacement names for Galeodes Heckel, 1854 and Orthodon Coquand, 1859 (Chondrichthyes, ?Galeomorphii)

References

1. Agassiz, J.L.R. (1837–1843) Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. Tome III. Petitpierre, Neuchâtel & Jent et Gassmann, Soleure, viii + 390 + 34 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4275
2. Bacskay, E. & Calzada, S. (2013) Sobre la colección Coquand y sus holotipos del Aptiense español. Scripta Musei Geologici Seminarii Barcinonensis, Series Palaeontologica, 13, 10–17.
3. Bailey, R.M. (1994) Comments on the proposed conservation of the specific name of Cliola (Hybopsis) topeka Gilbert, 1884 (currently Notropis topeka) (Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes). The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 51 (3), 262–263. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.7211
4. Bassani, F. (1888) Ricerche sui pesci fossili di Chiavòn (Strati di Sotzka — Miocene inferiore). Rendiconto della Reale Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche, Serie Seconda, 2 (7), 373–382.
5. Bassani, F. (1889) Ricerche sui pesci fossili di Chiavòn (Strati di Sotzka — Miocene Inferiore). Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche, Serie Seconda, 3 (6), 1–104, 18 pls.
6. Blainville, H.M.D. de (1816) Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Bulletin des sciences, par la Société philomatique de Paris, 1816, 113–124.
7. Brignon, A. (2014) Les recherches paléoichthyologiques et géologiques sur le gisement permien de Muse près d’Autun (Saône-et-Loire) au début du XIXe siècle. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 185 (4), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.185.4.233
8. Cahuzac, B., Adnet, S., Cappetta, H. & Vullo, R. (2007) Les espèces et genres de poissons Sélaciens fossiles (Crétacé, Tertiaire) créés dans le Bassin d'Aquitaine; recensement, taxonomie. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, Nouvelle Série, 35 (1), 3–43.
9. Compagno, L.J.V. (1973) Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 53 (Supplement 1), 15–61, 2 pls.
10. Coquand, H. (1859) Synopsis des animaux et des végétaux fossiles observés dans la formation crétacée du sud-ouest de la France. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, Deuxième Série, 16, 945–1023.
11. Coquand, H. (1860) Description physique, géologique, paléontologique et minéralogique du département de la Charente. Tome deuxième. Barlatier-Feissat et Demonchy, Marseille, 420 pp.
12. Cuvier, J.L.N.F. (1816) Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base a l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction a l’anatomie comparée. Tome II. Contenant les reptiles, les poissons, les mollusques et les annélides. Deterville, Paris, xviii + 532 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.41460
13. D’Erasmo, G. (1922) Catalogo dei Pesci fossili delle Tre Venezie. Memorie dell’Istituto Geologico della R. Università di Padova, 6 (7), 1–181, 6 pls.
14. Ebersole, J.A., Cicimurri, D.J. & Stringer, G.L. (2019) Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the elasmobranchs and bony fishes (Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes) of the lower-to-middle Eocene (Ypresian to Bartonian) Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA, including an analysis of otoliths. European Journal of Taxonomy, 585, 1–274. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.585
15. Evenhuis, N.L. (2003) Dating and publication of the Encyclopédie méthodique (1782–1832), with special reference to the parts of the Histoire naturelle and details on the Histoire naturelle des insectes. Zootaxa, 166 (1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.166.1.1
16. Fowler, H.W. (1941) Contributions to the biology of the Philippine archipelago and adjacent regions. The fishes of the groups Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, Isospondyli, and Ostarophysi obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries steamer “Albatross” in 1907 to 1910, chiefly in the Philippine islands and adjacent seas. United States National Museum Bulletin, 100 (13), i–x + 1–879. [http://hdl.handle.net/10088/21251]
17. Fowler, H.W. (1967) A catalog of world fishes (VII). Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum, 20 (3–4), 341–366.
18. Girard, C.F. (1856) Researches upon the cyprinoid fishes inhabiting the fresh waters of the United States of America, west of the Mississippi Valley, from specimens in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8, 165–213.
19. Heckel, J.J. (1854) Über fossile Fische aus Chiavon und das geologische Alter der sie enthaltenden Schichten. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 11 (2), 322–334.
20. Huxley, T.H. (1881) On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London, 1880 (4), 649–662.
21. ICZN (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. 4th Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London & Natural History Museum, London, xxix + 306 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50608
22. Jordan, D.S. (1919) The genera of fishes. Part III. From Guenther to Gill, 1859–1880, twenty-two years, with the accepted type of each. A contribution to the stability of scientific nomenclature. Leland Stanford Junior University Publications, University Series, 39, 285–410 + i–xv. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.160055
23. Müller, J.P. & Henle, F.G.J. (1837) Hr. Müller las über die Gattungen der Haifische und Rochen nach einer von ihm mit Hrn. Henle unternommenen gemeinschaftlichen Arbeit über die Naturgeschichte der Knorpelfische. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Kӧnigl. Preuss. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 2, 111–118.
24. Olivier, G.-A. (1791–1792) Encyclopédie méthodique. Histoire naturelle. Insectes. Tome sixième. Panckoucke, Paris, 704 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82248
25. Pálfy, J., Dulai, A., Gasparik, M., Ozsvárt, P., Pazonyi, P. & Szives, O. (2008) Catalogue of invertebrate and vertebrate paleontological type specimens of the Hungarian Natural History Museum. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, 209 pp.
26. Ridewood, W.G. (1921) On the calcification of the vertebral centra in sharks and rays. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 210 (379), 311–407. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1921.0008
27. Roux, C. (1976) On the dating of the first edition of Cuvier's Règne animal. Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 8 (1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3366/jsbnh.1976.8.1.31
28. Svojtka, M., Salvini-Plawen, L. & Mikschi, E. (2012) Johann Jakob Heckel (1790–1857), der Begründer der systematischen Ichthyologie in Österreich: Ein biographischer Überblick. Schriften Verein zur Verbreitung naturwissenschaftlicher Kenntnisse, 148–150, 43–74.
29. Türtscher, J., López-Romero, F.A., Jambura, P.L., Kindlimann, R., Ward, D.J. & Kriwet, J. (2021) Evolution, diversity, and disparity of the tiger shark lineage Galeocerdo in deep time. Paleobiology, 47 (4), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2021.6
30. White, E.I. & Moy-Thomas, J.A. (1940) Notes on the nomenclature of fossil fishes. Part II. Homonyms D–L. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 11, 6 (31), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222934008527079
31. White, E.I. & Moy-Thomas, J.A. (1941) Notes on the nomenclature of fossil fishes. Part III. Homonyms M–Z. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 11, 7 (40), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03745481.1941.9727941
32. Woodward, A.S. (1889) Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, S.W. Part I. Containing the Elasmobranchii. Trustees of the British Museum, London, xlvii + 474 pp., 17 pls. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.161983