Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2025-02-19
Page range: 410-415
Abstract views: 107
PDF downloaded: 5

Shooting the phantom: what is Octolasion tyrtaeum?

Department of Zoology; Eszterházy Károly Catholic University; H3300 Eger; Leányka út 6.; Hungary
Department of Zoology; Eszterházy Károly Catholic University; H3300 Eger; Leányka út 6.; Hungary
Annelida Octolasion nomenclature synonymy

Abstract

Our study follows the history of the species name tyrtaeum, from the scanty original description as Enterion tyrtaeum by Savigny, 1826 through the loss of type specimen, additional description by Ribaucourt, confusion in the later literature, suggested synonymy with O. lacteum and different opinions of the different authors. Our molecular phylogenetic study within the genus Octolasion reflects the inconsistency in the name usage and shows that O. lacteum and O. tyrtaeum can’t be separated genetically. As a solution of the problem, the name E. tyrtaeum is suggested to be treated as a Lumbricus species incertae sedis.

 

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrow, B.N. & Csáki, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267–281.
  2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
  3. Beddard, F.E. (1895) A monograph of the order of Oligochaeta. Oxford, 721 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.28557
  4. Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Clark, K., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J. & Sayers, E.W. (2012) Genbank. Nucleid Acids Research, 40 (Database issue), D48–D53. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1202
  5. Blakemore, R.J. (2008) Cosmopolitan earthworms – an Eco-Taxonomic Guide to the Species (3rd Edition). VermEcology, Yokohama, Japan, 757 pp.
  6. Bouché, M.B. (1972) Lombriciens de France. Écologie et Systématique. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Articles de Zoologie-Écologie animale (Numéro hors-série), 671 pp.
  7. Bouché, M.B. (1976) Contribution à la stabilisation de la nomenclature des Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta 1. Synonymies et homonymies d’espèces du bassin Parisien. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 354, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.281387
  8. Csuzdi, Cs. (2012) Earthworm species, a searchable database. Opuscula Zoologica, Budapest, 43 (1), 97–99.
  9. Csuzdi, Cs. & Zicsi, A. (2003) Earthworms of Hungary (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, 271 pp.
  10. Černosvitov, L. (1931) Eine neue Lumbricus-Art aus der Umgebung von Prag. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 96, 201–204.
  11. Dugès, A. (1837) Nouvelles observations sur la zoologie et l’anatomie des Annélides sétigéres abranches. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Paris ser. 2 Zoologie, 8, 15–35.
  12. Easton, E.G. (1983) A guide to the valid names of Lumbricidae (Oligochaeta). In: Satchell, J.E. (Ed.), Earthworm ecology from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5965-1_41
  13. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299.
  14. Gates, G.E. (1973) Contributions to North American Earthworms (Annelida). No. 8. The Earthworm Genus Octolasion in America. Bulletin of Tall Timbers Research Station, 14, 29–50.
  15. ICZN (1986) Opinion 1403. Lumbricus lacteus Örley, 1881 Designated as type speces of Octolasion Örley, 1885 (Annelida, Oligochaeta. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 43, 235–236.
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B., Wong, T., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L.S. (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods, 14, 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  17. Katoh, K. & Standley, D.M. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  18. Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  19. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35 (6), 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  20. Martinsson, S., Rhodén, C. & Erséus, C. (2015) Barcoding gap, but no support for cryptic speciation in the earthworm Aporrectodea longa (Clitellata: Lumbricidae). Mitochondrial DNA, 28 (2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1115487
  21. Michaelsen, W. (1900) Oligochaeta. Das Tierreich X. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin, 575 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1108
  22. Mršić, N. (1991) Monograph on earthworms (Lumbricidae) of the Balkans I-II. Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Zazred za Naravoslovne Vede Opera 31 Ljubljana, 757 pp.
  23. Nguyen, L.T., Schmidt, H.A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B.Q. (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32 (1), 268–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  24. Pop, A.A., Csuzdi, Cs., Wink, M. & Pop, V.V. (2008) Molecular taxonomy and phylogeny of the genera Octolasion Örley, 1885, Octodrilus Omodeo, 1956 and Octodriloides Zicsi, 1986 (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) based on nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial 16S rDNA and COI genes. In: Pavliček, T. & Cardet, P. (Eds.), Advances in earthworm taxonomy III. (Annelida, Oligochaeta). The Environment of Service of the Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 109–125.
  25. Puillandre, N., Brouillet, S. & Achaz, G. (2021) ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21 (2), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281
  26. Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
  27. Reynolds, J.W. (2022) The earthworms (Lumbricidae, Megascolecidae and Sparganophilidae) in Canada. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, 179 pp.
  28. Reynolds, J.W. (2024) Recent Discovery of Octolasion Species in Leh-Ladakh, Union Territory, India Represents a Cosmopolitan European Species. Innovations in Biological Science, 2, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ibs/v2/3592G
  29. Ribaucourt, E. (1896) Étude sur la faune Lombricide de la Suisse. Revue suisse de Zoologie, 4, 1–110. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.35505
  30. Rosa, D. (1893) Revisione dei Lumbricidi. Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, Torino, 43, 399–476.
  31. Savigny, J.C. (1826) In G. Cuvier: Analyse des Travaux de l’Academie royale des Sciences, pendant l’année 1821, partie physique. Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Institut de France Paris, 5, 176–184.
  32. Shekhovtsov, S.V., Golovanova, E.V. & Peltek, S.E. (2014) Genetic diversity of the earthworm Octolasion tyrtaeum (Lumbricidae, Annelida). Pedobiologia, 57 (4–6), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.09.002
  33. Sims, R.W. (1983) The scientific names of earthworms. In: Satchell, E.J. (Ed.), Earthworm Ecology from Darwin to Vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5965-1_40
  34. Tétry, A. (1937) Contribution à l’étude de la faune de l’est de la France. Nancy, Georges Thomas, 453 pp.
  35. Zicsi, A. (1982) Verzeichnis der bis 1971 beschriebenen und revidierten Taxa der Familie Lumbricidae (Oligochaeta). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 28, 421–454.